The dramatic World Test Championship final between Australia and South Africa delivered a spectacular showcase of five-day cricket at its finest, yet the tournament's confusing structure has sparked widespread calls for reform among cricket's elite.

In a nail-biting contest at Lord's that swung like a pendulum, South Africa clinched victory by five wickets just before lunch on day four. The match saw bowlers dominate early with 24 wickets falling in two days, before batsmen staged an epic comeback as conditions eased – proving Test cricket can rival any white-knuckle limited-overs thriller.

While the final produced unforgettable drama, the WTC's overall framework remains problematic – featuring inconsistent scheduling, an opaque points system, and glaring competitive imbalances that leave fans scratching their heads.

A key controversy emerged when South Africa reached the championship match without facing either Australia or England during the two-year qualification cycle. "How can fans truly know who deserves to be in the final when teams play such radically different schedules?" questioned former England skipper Michael Vaughan during commentary.

The qualification system calculates percentages from available points across Test series wins and draws. ICC officials hint future finals may rotate between Lord's and Indian venues starting with the next edition in three years. But stark disparities emerged as South Africa played just twelve Tests compared to Australia (19), India (19) and England (22).

"I've never really focused on understanding the WTC because frankly it makes no sense," admitted current England captain Ben Stokes bluntly.

The root issue lies in allowing nations complete autonomy over their Test schedules. For financially-strapped boards like Cricket South Africa, prioritizing lucrative short-format matches over money-losing Tests creates these imbalances naturally.

A new cycle begins this week with Bangladesh touring Sri Lanka for two Tests. Champions will now play fourteen matches including three-Test series against Australia and England but only two against India - continuing an uneven approach where only those three wealthy nations regularly schedule five-Test marquee series between themselves.

"The fixture list resembles Swiss cheese - full of holes where some teams get easier paths than others," wrote veteran journalist Michael Atherton recently about what he called "the WTC’s fundamental flaws".

Cricket administrators face mounting pressure to redesign what many see as a noble but deeply flawed attempt to crown true world champions of Test cricket’s purest form while balancing commercial realities of modern sports economics.